Opinion
No. 104159.
May 21, 1996.
Summary Dispositions May 21, 1996:
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the trial court to make findings with regard to whether, at sentencing, it recognized that it had the discretion to impose a concurrent rather than a consecutive sentence in this case or, since consecutive sentencing does not seem to be one of the components of the plea bargain agreement, whether the imposition of a consecutive sentence in this case was based on a mistake of fact with regard to the provisions of the plea bargain agreement. The findings of the trial court are to be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court. MCR 7.302(F)(1). Jurisdiction is retained.
Court of Appeals No. 166466.