From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kamack

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Oct 19, 2011
B222456 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

B222456

10-19-2011

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAMELLE KAMACK et al., Defendants and Appellants.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA069698)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[No Change in Judgment]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 7, 2011, be modified as follows:

On page 31, the disposition, after the first sentence, insert the following footnote, which would be footnote 15:

As previously noted, the trial court has already issued an amended abstract of judgment in Kamack's case, but it shows that a 15-year enhancement pursuant to section 186.22, subdivision (b)(5) was imposed and stayed, which is an incorrect sentence. We presume this error will be corrected when the abstract of judgment is amended to strike Kamack's gang enhancement in accordance with this opinion.

This modification does not effect a change in judgment.


Summaries of

People v. Kamack

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Oct 19, 2011
B222456 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

People v. Kamack

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAMELLE KAMACK et al., Defendants…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

B222456 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2011)