From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Justiniano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1967
29 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

December 29, 1967


In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 1966, which, without a hearing, denied his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered May 24, 1960, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, on his guilty plea, and imposing an indefinite penitentiary sentence. Order affirmed. Defendant's attack on the judgment is based on his contention that the facts elicited from him by the court at the time he pleaded guilty did not spell out the crime to which he pleaded guilty and that in such case the court could not accept the guilty plea and impose sentence. The alleged error, if in fact it exists, would be one that appears on the face of the record. Hence, coram nobis is not an available remedy ( People v. Sadness, 300 N.Y. 69, 74; People v. McGuire, 13 A.D.2d 794). In any event, we have examined the record and it is our opinion that on the merits defendant has not shown that the alleged error occurred or that he has a right to the relief he requests or that the interests of justice warrant the grant of such relief. Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Justiniano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1967
29 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

People v. Justiniano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERTO JUSTINIANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1967

Citations

29 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

United States ex Rel. Hoover v. State of N.Y.

In Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), the Supreme Court applied a "cause…

People v. Flushing Hosp

The defendant is precluded from raising these objections in a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, since the basis…