From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 19, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. KA 07-02578.

June 19, 2009.

Present: Smith, J.P., Centra, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.


Upon the Court's own motion, the memorandum and order entered February 6, 2009 ( 59 AD3d 942, amended on rearg 63 AD3d 1671) is further amended by deleting "as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and" from the ordering paragraph and by deleting the fifth sentence of the memorandum and substituting the following sentences: "We reach this issue sua sponte, and we note that preservation is not required inasmuch as the ` "essential nature" of the right to be sentenced as provided by law' is implicated ( People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152, 156). To the extent that People v Jackson ( 23 AD3d 1057, lv denied 6 NY3d 814) holds otherwise, it is no longer to be followed."


Summaries of

People v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 19, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERRI L. BUNNELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5162
880 N.Y.S.2d 602

Citing Cases

People v. Joseph

Penal Law § 60.27(2) provides that, “[i]f the record does not contain sufficient evidence [of the amount of…

People v. Hensley

Here, there was ample evidence from which the jury could conclude that defendant constructively possessed the…