Opinion
June 1, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the evidence supports the trial court's findings that the defendant acted with criminal negligence, and that the pellet gun that he admittedly fired caused the injury to the complainant's eye. Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.