From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1995
213 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

At approximately 5:00 A.M. on May 5, 1991, the defendant and the codefendant Errol "Batman" Baptiste accosted Ricky Thomas and Thomas's cousin Martin Williams outside a night-club in Brooklyn. The defendants, each armed with a hand-gun, attacked and threatened to kill Thomas and Williams. Thomas fled and the defendant and codefendant pursued him, firing at him repeatedly. Police officers arrived on the scene and found Thomas lying dead in the street.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the court erred by not issuing a circumstantial evidence charge (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Burgos, 170 A.D.2d 689). In any event, the circumstantial evidence charge is required only when the evidence of guilt is exclusively circumstantial, which was not the case here (see, People v. Ford, 66 N.Y.2d 428; People v. Pilgrim, 208 A.D.2d 868). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Joseph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1995
213 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLTON JOSEPH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 34