From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jordan

Michigan Court of Appeals
Apr 26, 1971
33 Mich. App. 15 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Summary

In People v. Jordan (1971), 33 Mich. App. 15, ante, an absconded probationer with a long record which included acts of violence, while awaiting disposition of pending charges of auto theft, possession of stolen motor vehicles, forgery, and probation violation, held up a used car lot and shot and killed the fleeing salesman.

Summary of this case from People v. Haggitt

Opinion

Docket No. 7283.

Decided April 26, 1971. Leave to appeal applied for.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, Thomas L. Poindexter, J. Submitted Division 1 November 12, 1970, at Detroit. (Docket No. 7283.) Decided April 26, 1971. Leave to appeal applied for.

Wallace T. Jordan was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of manslaughter. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Gerald S. Surowiec, for defendant on appeal.

Before: V.J. BRENNAN, P.J., and LEVIN and PETERSON, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


Defendant was charged with first-degree murder in the fatal shooting of Kenneth Demarest on July 29, 1968. Defendant was allowed to plead guilty to the lesser included offense of manslaughter. The court accepted the plea and sentenced defendant to serve 14 years and 11 months to 15 years in prison. From the conviction and sentence defendant brings this appeal.

MCLA § 750.316 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.548).

MCLA § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553).

None of defendant's three assignments of error requires reversal.

Defendant bases two of his allegations of error on the failure of the trial court to inform him of the consequences of his plea as required by GCR 1963, 785.3(2). Specifically, defendant complains that the trial court: (1) failed to specifically enumerate the three constitutional rights which he waives by pleading guilty and (2) failed to inform him that he could be sent to prison. Defendant's reliance on Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238 ( 89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274), in this connection is misplaced. Boykin has been held not to oblige the court to enumerate the three Federal constitutional rights waived by a guilty plea. People v. Jaworski (1970), 25 Mich. App. 540.

Privilege against self-incrimination, right to trial by jury, and right to confront his accusers.

As to defendant's second contention, a fair reading of the transcript indicates that the trial court did inform the defendant that he might be sent to prison.

Defendant had a long criminal record prior to this offense. In fact, he was serving a five-year term in Federal prison at the time of sentencing. Also, counsel was provided for him at his request. We are convinced that the defendant knowingly, freely, and voluntarily tendered his plea.

Finally, defendant alleges that a minimum sentence of 14 years and 11 months, when the statutory maximum is 15 years, is not an indeterminate sentence as required by MCLA § 769.8 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1080). An appellate court will not ordinarily review claims that the trial court abused its discretion where the sentence imposed falls within the statutory limits. People v. Girard (1969), 18 Mich. App. 593; People v. Pate (1965), 2 Mich. App. 66; People v. Guillett (1955), 342 Mich. 1; People v. Wright (1968), 19 Mich. App. 242. Suffice it to say that the sentence in this case is within the statutory maximum.

Affirmed.

Judge LEVIN concurs in the affirmance of the conviction but would remand for resentencing for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in People v. Haggitt (1971), 33 Mich. App. 95, post.


Summaries of

People v. Jordan

Michigan Court of Appeals
Apr 26, 1971
33 Mich. App. 15 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

In People v. Jordan (1971), 33 Mich. App. 15, ante, an absconded probationer with a long record which included acts of violence, while awaiting disposition of pending charges of auto theft, possession of stolen motor vehicles, forgery, and probation violation, held up a used car lot and shot and killed the fleeing salesman.

Summary of this case from People v. Haggitt
Case details for

People v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. JORDAN

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 26, 1971

Citations

33 Mich. App. 15 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
189 N.W.2d 851

Citing Cases

People v. Redwine

This Court upheld the sentence on the basis of the "trial court's discretion", which could take into…

People v. Haggitt

MCLA § 769.8 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1080). In People v. Jordan (1971), 33 Mich. App. 15, ante, an absconded…