From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 2004
11 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04047

October 12, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered April 14, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Smith, J.P., Adams, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecutor's summation deprived him of due process and a fair trial. However, the majority of the defendant's current objections are not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886; People v. Brownridge, 267 AD2d 318). In any event, the prosecutor's statements constituted fair responses to remarks made by the defense counsel during summation ( see People v. Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821; People v. Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v. Ryant, 278 AD2d 345).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 2004
11 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD JORDAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 641

Citing Cases

People v. German

With the exception of his argument concerning one remark, the defendant's arguments were not preserved for…

People v. Friel

The defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain remarks made by the prosecutor during…