Opinion
December 3, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.).
Our order affirming the judgment against codefendant Howell ( 174 A.D.2d 356, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1012) rejected the same challenge to the circumstantial evidence charge now raised by defendant, and no basis exists to reach a different result here.
We have reviewed defendant's argument concerning the sufficiency of the evidence and find it to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.