From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2023
189 N.Y.S.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

2020–03433 Ind. No. 1741/18

06-21-2023

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tadarrell JONES, appellant.

Jillian S. Harrington, Staten Island, NY, for appellant. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Paul B. Lyons and Robert C. McIver of counsel), for respondent.


Jillian S. Harrington, Staten Island, NY, for appellant.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Paul B. Lyons and Robert C. McIver of counsel), for respondent.

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., PAUL WOOTEN, WILLIAM G. FORD, JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert A. McDonald, J.), rendered September 12, 2019, convicting him of criminal sale of a firearm in the second degree, criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree (five counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (five counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (seven counts), criminal possession of a firearm (five counts), endangering the welfare of a child (four counts), and conspiracy in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, as he did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise the issue before the Supreme Court (see People v. Pray, 183 A.D.3d 842, 842, 124 N.Y.S.3d 59 ; People v. Coleman, 138 A.D.3d 1014, 1015, 29 N.Y.S.3d 552 ; People v. Catts, 26 A.D.3d 341, 341, 812 N.Y.S.2d 549 ), and the narrow exception to the preservation rule is inapplicable in this case (see People v. Patel, 74 A.D.3d 1098, 1099, 904 N.Y.S.2d 99 ). In any event, the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered.

The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and, thus, constitutes a "mixed claim of ineffective assistance" ( People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d 1108, 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386 ). Since the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety, and we decline to review the claim on this direct appeal (see People v. Freeman, 93 A.D.3d 805, 806, 940 N.Y.S.2d 314 ; People v. Maxwell, 89 A.D.3d at 1109, 933 N.Y.S.2d 386 ).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

CONNOLLY, J.P., WOOTEN, FORD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 21, 2023
189 N.Y.S.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tadarrell JONES, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 21, 2023

Citations

189 N.Y.S.3d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Citing Cases

People v. Bautista

Further, the defendant confirmed during the plea allocution that he was pleading guilty voluntarily…