From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 1, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.).


Defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of rape in the first degree and attempted rape in the first degree in satisfaction of other pending charges and was sentenced as a second felony offender to consecutive prison terms of 12 1/2 to 25 years and 7 1/2 to 15 years, respectively. As part of his plea, he waived his right to appeal except as to the harshness or excessiveness of the sentence. Inasmuch as we find that this waiver was knowing and voluntary, defendant is precluded from raising substantive arguments on this appeal. Nonetheless, were we to consider the merits, we would find on the record before us that defendant was provided with meaningful representation and, hence, was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. We would further find that County Court did not err in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Lastly, in view of the serious nature of the crimes, defendant's lengthy criminal record and the fact that the sentence imposed was within statutory parameters, we reject defendant's claim that the sentence was harsh and excessive.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD P. JONES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

People v. Lord

In satisfaction of a three-count superior court information, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of…

People v. Glass

Defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial due to the purported mistakes that undergird his…