From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 21, 2018
68 N.Y.S.3d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–04668 Ind. No. 5022/15

02-21-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Austin JONES, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Hannah Zhao of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Hannah Zhao of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., REINALDO E. RIVERA, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERAppeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Betty J. Williams, J.), imposed March 30, 2016, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Rennick, 123 A.D.3d 1146, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637 ; People v. Reyes, 121 A.D.3d 820, 993 N.Y.S.2d 379 ; People v. Coleman, 116 A.D.3d 708, 982 N.Y.S.2d 784 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, AUSTIN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 21, 2018
68 N.Y.S.3d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Austin JONES, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 21, 2018

Citations

68 N.Y.S.3d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)