Summary
In Jones, the court relied upon People v McKenna (76 NY2d 59), People v Harris (82 NY2d 409) and People v Douglas (209 AD2d 161 [1st Dept 1994]), noting that case law supports the principle that the People cannot be charged with the time a court takes to decide a defense motion unless the People, by their unjustified action or inaction, are directly responsible for all or a portion of the delay.
Summary of this case from People v. Asmal-AucapinaOpinion
April 30, 2008.
Crimes-Right to Speedy Trial — Defendant's Pretrial Motions.