From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-05682.

May 31, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered May 13, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Michael G. Paul, New City, N.Y., for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Florio, Leventhal, Belen and Cohen, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing ( see CPL 470.05; People v Trent, 74 AD3d 1370; People v Simpson, 52 AD3d 846; People v Ramsey, 49 AD3d 565; People v Rusielewicz, 45 AD3d 704). In any event, his plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543; People v Martinez, 33 AD3d 631, 632; cf. People v Knox, 56 AD3d 799, 800).

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit ( see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83-86).


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH G. JONES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 1409 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4705
924 N.Y.S.2d 280

Citing Cases

People v. Gibson

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered…

People v. Gibson

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered…