Opinion
SC: 150488 SC: 150489
03-29-2016
Order
150488-9 & (57)(58)(59)(60) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 315582
Allegan CC: 08-015991-FH COA: 315713
Allegan CC: 08-016032-FH
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the motions to remand and for appeal bond are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND these cases to the Allegan Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed materially different sentences under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. The trial court shall also consider the defendant's argument concerning the imposition of costs, and determine whether costs should be imposed and the amount, if any, that should be assessed. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for bond pending appeal is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
March 29, 2016
/s/_________
Clerk