From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1989
156 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 20, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly found that the prosecutor proffered reasonably specific race-neutral reasons for his use of peremptory challenges to exclude three black members of the jury panel (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79; People v Scott, 70 N.Y.2d 420; People v Burnett, 152 A.D.2d 910). On this record, we find no abuse of discretion by the sentencing court in imposing the maximum permissible sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1989
156 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARTIN JONES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
549 N.Y.S.2d 250

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant's claim that the prosecutor…

People v. Davis

There is no merit to defendant's Batson claim (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79) that the prosecutor used…