From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Apr 16, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

No. 570605/11.

2013-04-16

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey JONES, Defendant–Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered May 23, 2011, convicting him, after a nonjury trial, of attempted criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.
Present: SCHOENFELD, J.P., HUNTER, JR., TORRES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered May 23, 2011, affirmed.

The verdict convicting defendant of attempted criminal mischief in the fourth degree ( seePenal Law §§ 110.00, 145.00[1] ) was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, notwithstanding defendant's acquittal of the attempted assault charge ( see People v. Rayam, 94 N.Y.2d 557 [2000] ). There was ample evidence establishing that the complainant had an “ownership interest” ( seePenal Law § 145.13) in the food that the “enraged” defendant admittedly threw out of the complainant's ninth floor apartment window during the disputants' violent argument and that defendant had no right to damage the property “nor any reasonable ground to believe that he ... ha[d] such right” (Penal Law § 145.00; see Donnino, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law § 145.00, at 187–189).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Apr 16, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Jones…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Apr 16, 2013

Citations

39 Misc. 3d 135 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 50588
971 N.Y.S.2d 73

Citing Cases

People v. Morales

s extended family, and defendant's knowledge that his entry was unlawful, were established by the testimony…

People v. Floyd

nd removed a lock from the door with a hammer requiring the installation of a replacement lock (Incident 3)…