From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 21, 1997.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J., on speedy trial motion; Dorothy Cropper, J., at nonjury trial), rendered February 17, 1994, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. There is no merit to defendant's argument that the People's failure to explain the delay in production of Grand Jury minutes for inspection renders the entire period of non-production chargeable to the People. On the contrary, a reasonable period is excludable ( People v Harris, 82 NY2d 409; People v Lawrence, 222 AD2d 279). Moreover, adjournments which are otherwise excludable pursuant to CPL 30.30 (4) are excludable from the period of non-production ( People v Taylor, 217 AD2d 404).

We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MAURICE JONES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 297 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
653 N.Y.S.2d 307

Citing Cases

People v. Khan

The court properly denied defendant's speedy trial motion. The delay during the period in question was…

People v. Luna

Defendants' speedy trial motions were properly denied. In this connection, we find that the motion court…