From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1995
85 N.Y.2d 998 (N.Y. 1995)

Opinion

Decided June 8, 1995

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Charles T. Maloy, J.

Howard R. Relin, District Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Wendy Evans Lehmann of counsel), for appellant.

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender of Monroe County, Rochester (James Eckert of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed.

The People raised for the first time at the Appellate Division the specific argument that further neurological testing was not necessary to prove a justification defense. Because this argument is unpreserved, the Appellate Division's conclusion that County Court abused its discretion in denying authorization for further neurological testing is not reviewable in this Court (see, People v Dodt, 61 N.Y.2d 408, 416). Because this unreviewable ruling forms an independent ground for reversal of the judgment of conviction, and because the results of the further neurological evaluation are unknown, we do not reach the question whether County Court abused its discretion in limiting the scope of expert testimony.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1995
85 N.Y.2d 998 (N.Y. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. WILLIE JONES, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 1995

Citations

85 N.Y.2d 998 (N.Y. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 961
654 N.E.2d 1209

Citing Cases

State v. Kabete

On these issues, Dr. Weiss's testimony would likely be capable of assisting the trier of fact. See People v.…

People v. Steinmetz

much as such evidence completed the narrative of events and explained the actions of the officers as they…