From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 16, 2006
26 A.D.3d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

7878, 7879.

February 16, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered March 17, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1½ to 4½ years, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 8, 2003, which denied defendant's CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed.

Laura R. Johnson, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Sheilah Fernandez of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Jill Graziano of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ. Concur.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility ( see People v. Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's CPL 440.10 motion without a hearing ( see CPL 440.30 [a], [b]). Although defendant claimed that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by failing to call a particular witness, defendant's moving papers gave no indication of the substance of the potential witness's testimony ( see People v. Session, 34 NY2d 254).


Summaries of

People v. Jon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 16, 2006
26 A.D.3d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Jon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMON JON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1239
810 N.Y.S.2d 447

Citing Cases

People v. Santiago

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's CPL 440 motion without holding a hearing,…