From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.
Apr 7, 2015
235 Cal.App.4th 956 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. A136573 A140310 A143775.

04-07-2015

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAMAR JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant.In re LAMAR JOHNSON on Habeas Corpus.


[Modification of opinion (235 Cal.App.4th 228, ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED the opinion filed on March 17, 2015, be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

On page 6, in the last line of the first paragraph [235 Cal.App.4th 237, advance report, 3d full par., line 16], the word "generally" is inserted before "prohibited by Proposition 13 altogether."

On page 8, in the last two lines of the second full paragraph [235 Cal.App.4th 239, advance report, 3d full par., line 5], the word "two thirds" is inserted before "majority of voters" and "subd. (b)" is replaced with "subd. (d)".

On page 26, in the fourth sentence of the last paragraph beginning with "Large-scale users such as the City receive a far greater benefit from individual landowners" [235 Cal.App.4th 255, advance report, 2d full par., line 9], the word "from" is replaced with "than".

There is no change in the judgment.

The City's petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.
Apr 7, 2015
235 Cal.App.4th 956 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAMAR JOHNSON, Defendant and…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

Date published: Apr 7, 2015

Citations

235 Cal.App.4th 956 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)