From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 31, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2012–07120 Ind.No. 5121/10

10-31-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Isa JOHNSON, Appellant.

The Legal Aid Society, New York, N.Y. (David Crow and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP [Deborah S. Sohn ], of counsel), for appellant.


The Legal Aid Society, New York, N.Y. (David Crow and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP [Deborah S. Sohn ], of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Paul Hastings LLP [Gary F. Giampetruzzi and Inna Coleman ], of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE BETSY BARROS LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Alan Marrus, J.), rendered July 16, 2012, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and attempted assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court should have granted his motion for a mistrial based on the prosecution's failure to timely disclose information pertaining to a pending criminal action against a prosecution witness (see Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 ; People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, 213 N.Y.S.2d 448, 173 N.E.2d 881 ; CPL 240.45[1][c] ). The defendant failed to demonstrate that he suffered any prejudice from the delay in disclosure (see CPL 240.75 ; People v. Sanchez, 144 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 43 N.Y.S.3d 80 ; People v. King, 298 A.D.2d 530, 531, 748 N.Y.S.2d 665 ; People v. Rodriguez, 269 A.D.2d 613, 704 N.Y.S.2d 822 ), and the information was provided to the defendant before cross-examination of the relevant witness (see People v. Sanchez, 144 A.D.3d at 1180, 43 N.Y.S.3d 80 ; People v. King, 298 A.D.2d at 531, 748 N.Y.S.2d 665 ).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ). The fact that a codefendant who pleaded guilty received a more lenient sentence does not warrant a reduction of the defendant's sentence (see People v. Leduc, 140 A.D.3d 1305, 1307, 34 N.Y.S.3d 208 ; People v. Merchant, 171 A.D.2d 887, 888, 567 N.Y.S.2d 812 ).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 31, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Isa Johnson, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

165 A.D.3d 1287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
165 A.D.3d 1287
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 7328

Citing Cases

People v. Lin Li

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that she is entitled to reversal of her convictions based…

People v. Li

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that she is entitled to reversal of her convictions based…