From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2000-04633.

Decided February 17, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullin, J.), dated April 24, 2000, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Anne E. Oh of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER and WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court's determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v. Oquendo, 1 A.D.3d 421; People v. Thomas, 300 A.D.2d 379).

RITTER, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent, v. CHARLES J. JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 674

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's determination to designate the defendant a level…