Opinion
No. 105913.
October 2, 1996.
Leave to Appeal Granted October 2, 1996:
The issues are limited to whether the attorney first appointed to represent the defendant was improperly removed and, if so, what remedy is appropriate. The appellant is to indicate in the brief on appeal whether it wishes to argue the propriety of the removal, or whether it wishes to limit appellate consideration to the issue of remedy. The appellee is to respond accordingly. Leave to cross appeal is denied. Reported below: 215 Mich. App. 658.
Appeal dismissed upon stipulation of the parties on March 12, 1997, with prejudice and without costs.