From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 8, 1980
75 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

April 8, 1980

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: While the initial police detention of the defendant lacked probable cause and was therefore illegal (Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200; People v Misuis, 47 N.Y.2d 979), his confession was not gained through the exploitation of this illegality. Instead, he made inculpatory statements only after the police, by virtue of their having obtained a statement from a codefendant which clearly implicated the defendant in these crimes, had obtained the probable cause necessary for a legal arrest (see People v. Berzups, 49 N.Y.2d 417). Since these admissions were otherwise voluntary, the defendant's motion to suppress was, therefore, properly denied. We have examined the defendant's remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 8, 1980
75 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1980

Citations

75 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Strange

In any event, the statements were not the product of defendant's initial detention by the two officers who…

People v. Rodriguez

It is clear that the police had obtained probable cause to detain the defendant on the instant burglary and…