From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1995
221 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 2, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J.).


Defendant's claim that his plea should not have been accepted since his allocution did not establish that the piece of metal he displayed in the course of the robbery was a dangerous instrument is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, defendant never having moved to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (People v Toxey, 202 A.D.2d 330, affd 86 N.Y.2d 725). Nor is review in the interest of justice warranted, since the alleged deficiency in the allocution did not negate an element of the crime or otherwise cast doubt on the voluntariness of the plea (supra).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1995
221 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN JAMAL JOHNSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 174 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 286

Citing Cases

People v. Fredericks

Before: Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ. Since defendant never moved to withdraw his plea…