From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. John

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1978
60 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

January 30, 1978


Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, each imposed January 6, 1977, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender under Indictments Nos. 1378-75, 1379-75 and 1380-75, the sentences being indeterminate terms of imprisonment, each with a maximum of four years, to be served consecutively. Sentences modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision that they shall be served consecutively and substituting therefor a provision that they shall run concurrently. As so modified, sentences affirmed. If the sentencing court believed that the defendant should be imprisoned for a maximum period of 12 years, it should not have afforded him youthful offender treatment. In sentencing him as a youthful offender to three consecutive four-year terms, the court exceeded its powers (see Penal Law, § 60.02; see, also, People ex rel. Fitzgibbons v Krueger, 66 Misc.2d 146). Rabin, J.P., Gulotta, Shapiro and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. John

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1978
60 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

People v. John

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MATTHEW JOHN G.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1978

Citations

60 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

People v. Simmons

We do agree, however, that the defendant was improperly sentenced under Indictment Nos. 170/87 and 5100/87…

People v. Lucci

05; People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281). However, in imposing consecutive sentences of 1 1/3 to 4 years…