From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. John

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1992
186 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

September 28, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

While the defendant seeks to have this Court review his claim that the sentences imposed were improper because they were in excess of those agreed upon at the time he pleaded guilty, we note that he did not seek to withdraw his pleas at the time of sentencing, upon learning of the court's intentions as to sentencing. Accordingly, the defendant has failed to preserve the issue for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Kendall, 159 A.D.2d 727), and we decline to reach the matter in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. We further note that the sentences imposed were not excessive. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. John

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 1992
186 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. John

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT JOHN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction. Accordingly, he has…

People v. Santana

Ordered that the judgments and amended judgment are affirmed. While the defendant seeks to have this Court…