From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. J.M.A. (In re J.M.A.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Jan 22, 2021
2021 IL 125680 (Ill. 2021)

Opinion

Docket No. 125680

01-22-2021

In re J.M.A., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. J.M.A., Appellant).


OPINION

¶ 1 In this case, one Justice of this court has recused himself, and the remaining members of the court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank of Chicago, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

¶ 2 CARTER, J., took no part.


Summaries of

People v. J.M.A. (In re J.M.A.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Jan 22, 2021
2021 IL 125680 (Ill. 2021)
Case details for

People v. J.M.A. (In re J.M.A.)

Case Details

Full title:In re J.M.A., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Jan 22, 2021

Citations

2021 IL 125680 (Ill. 2021)

Citing Cases

Sowell v. Sowell

See, e.g., In re JMA., 2021 IL 125680 (per curiam). They are applied to full-court…

People v. Sheldon

When there is no majority vote in a case under advisement, a per curiam opinion is issued, which explains…