From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jeschke

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
May 8, 2012
2d Crim. No. B237172 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 8, 2012)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B237172 Super. Ct. No. 1296568

05-08-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PETER AIBOR JESCHKE, Defendant and Appellant.

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant. No appearance for Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Santa Barbara County)

Peter Aibor Jeschke appeals from the judgment following his plea of no contest to furnishing marijuana to a minor (Health & Saf. Code, § 11361, subd. (b)), suborning perjury (Pen. Code, § 653f, subd. a)), and attempting to dissuade a witness from testifying (§136.1, subd. (a)). Pursuant to the negotiated plea, the trial court sentenced appellant to four years state prison, to be served concurrent with a seven year eight month prison sentence in Case Number 1256120. The trial court reserved jurisdiction on victim restitution (§ 1202.4, subd. (f)) and imposed a $200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a $200 parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45).

Unless otherwise stated, all statutory references are to the Penal Code.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 28, 2011.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.

On March 1, 2012, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has been received.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J. We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J.

Jean M. Dandona, Judge


Superior Court County of Santa Barbara

California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.


Summaries of

People v. Jeschke

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
May 8, 2012
2d Crim. No. B237172 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 8, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Jeschke

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PETER AIBOR JESCHKE, Defendant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

2d Crim. No. B237172 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 8, 2012)