From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1990
167 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 13, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant challenges the hearing court's denial of his motion to suppress his oral and written confessions. A review of the record reveals that the defendant's contention that his confession was obtained through psychological coercion is without merit. We find that the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant's confession was made voluntarily (see, People v. Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35; see, also, People v. Woods, 141 A.D.2d 588, 589).

The defendant contends that the People failed to prove that it was his physical abuse of the two-year-old victim that caused the child's death. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. The People proved that the defendant, while under the influence of crack-cocaine, caused the child's death by physically beating him. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant also contends that the trial court erred in permitting the arresting officer, who was a key prosecution witness, to sit at the prosecutor's table and to assist the prosecutor at trial. However, we find that the alleged error is not preserved for our review and, in any event, is harmless since the proof of the defendant's guilt is overwhelming and there exists no significant probability that, had it not been for the alleged error, the jury would have acquitted the defendant (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 242).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) and review of those contentions in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction is not warranted under the facts of this case. Brown, J.P., Kooper, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1990
167 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARIN JENKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 829

Citing Cases

People v. Hall

Moreover, the defendant had every opportunity to retreat safely without the use of deadly physical force (…

People v. Fischl

Contrary to the defendant's claim, his statements to the police were not subject to suppression on the ground…