From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1991
176 A.D.2d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 17, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Kleiman, J.).


Defendant was convicted of a chain snatching on a subway car. The victim pursued him, followed by a police officer, until defendant was apprehended by another police officer. A bystander on the train walked up to police and spontaneously identified defendant as the perpetrator. With respect to the bystander's identification, since this was not a police arranged identification procedure, the People were not required to provide notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1). (People v. Gissendanner, 48 N.Y.2d 543, 552; see, People v. Berkowitz, 50 N.Y.2d 333, 338, n 1; People v. Logan, 25 N.Y.2d 184, 193, cert denied 396 U.S. 1020.)

Defendant's contention that the trial court impermissibly interfered with examination of witnesses is meritless. The trial court, on a very limited basis, only clarified certain questions, a permissible exercise of the court's responsibility (cf., People v. Yut Wai Tom, 53 N.Y.2d 44).

The court erroneously instructed the jury that defendant's identity "must be shown with sufficient certainty to preclude a reasonable possibility of mistake". However, the identification charge as a whole conveyed the appropriate principles, and this single misstatement does not warrant reversal. Nor, in this direct evidence case, did the trial court's interjection of a moral certainty standard in its reasonable doubt instruction, warrant reversal. (See, e.g., People v. Jones, 156 A.D.2d 718, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 920.)

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1991
176 A.D.2d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENT JENKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 29

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

In any event, this argument is without merit. We further note that a spontaneous identification does not…

People v. Pritchard

On appeal, the defendant contends that the identification testimony of the complainant's three companions…