From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jeffrey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1998
254 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.).


Defendant's claim that the sentencing court's remarks concerning parole release constituted an enhanced sentence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's remarks were neither a directive to the Parole Board nor an enhancement of the promised sentence ( People v. Skinner, 232 A.D.2d 201, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 929; People v. Saldana, 221 A.D.2d 239, 240, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 1024).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Jeffrey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 29, 1998
254 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Jeffrey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH JEFFREY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 306

Citing Cases

People v. Trimm

While we have vacated the imposition of a fine as part of a sentence where there was no mention of a fine at…

People v. Faulknor

As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. The record fails to…