From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jeannis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 24, 2000.

April 3, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered May 4, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Grossman Rinaldo, Forest Hills, N.Y. (Stuart J. Grossman of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Ushir Pandit of counsel), for respondent.

DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Evidence of uncharged crimes was properly admitted to complete the narrative and to explain why the defendant was targeted (see,People v. Coleman, 205 A.D.2d 795, 796 ; People v. Campbell, 204 A.D.2d 474).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80 ).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal.


Summaries of

People v. Jeannis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Jeannis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. JACK JEANNIS, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

People v. Capers

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Evidence of uncharged criminal conduct by the defendant was properly…