From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jasso

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
Feb 9, 2011
No. D057669 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2011)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANIEL CITAL JASSO, Defendant and Appellant. D057669 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, First Division February 9, 2011

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County No. SCD218742, Jeffrey F. Fraser, Judge.

AARON, J.

Daniel Cital Jasso entered a negotiated guilty plea to two counts of kidnapping (Pen. Code, § 207, subd. (a)). The court sentenced him to a stipulated sentence of 13 years in prison: the eight-year upper term on one count and the five-year middle term on the other count. Jasso appeals. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Jasso ordered Raymundo Quezada, Rafael Ortiz and Gustavo Martinez, Jr., to kidnap Joshua Castrillon because Castrillon owed Jasso money for a drug deal that had gone awry. On February 2, 2009, Quezada, Ortiz and Martinez kidnapped Castrillon and his girlfriend, Silvia Arellano.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel lists as possible, but not arguable, issues: (1) the validity of the guilty plea and sentence; (2) the effect of the trial court's denial of a certificate of probable cause; and (3) whether full-strength consecutive terms were lawful (Pen. Code, § 1170.1, subd. (b)).

We granted Jasso permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues listed pursuant to Anders, supra, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Jasso has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

WE CONCUR: McINTYRE, Acting P. J., IRION, J.


Summaries of

People v. Jasso

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
Feb 9, 2011
No. D057669 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2011)
Case details for

People v. Jasso

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANIEL CITAL JASSO, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division

Date published: Feb 9, 2011

Citations

No. D057669 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 9, 2011)