From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jarvis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-28

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kharye JARVIS, Defendant–Appellant.


MEMORANDUM:

Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, in failing to argue ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of March 11, 1994 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo ( see People v. LeFrois, 151 A.D.2d 1046, 544 N.Y.S.2d 508 [1989] ). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before December 28, 2012.

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted.

SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jarvis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Jarvis

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kharye JARVIS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6501
951 N.Y.S.2d 421

Citing Cases

People v. Jarvis

In 2012, defendant moved for a writ of error coram nobis in this Court, asserting that appellate counsel was…