Opinion
October 26, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The record on appeal does not support the defendant's contention that the sentencing court declined to impose lesser sentences due to a mistaken belief that it lacked authority to impose sentences more lenient than the prosecutor's sentencing recommendations, which recommendations were the terms of the plea bargain. Here, the nature and scope of the defendant's criminal acts, the pertinent facts appearing in the record, and the results of the presentence investigation furnish a sound basis for the court's imposition of sentence in accord with the prosecutor's recommendations (see, People v. Gittelson, 25 A.D.2d 265, 272, affd 18 N.Y.2d 427). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.