From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Harbater, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to cross-examine a defense witness regarding his failure to present exculpatory information to law enforcement authorities without first establishing the proper foundation, as required by People v. Dawson ( 50 N.Y.2d 311), for such cross-examination (see, People v. Morris, 100 A.D.2d 600). Furthermore, the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that a witness has no moral or civil obligation to go to the police with exculpatory information (see, People v. Brown, 104 A.D.2d 383). However, in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, these errors are harmless (see, People v. Cook, 117 A.D.2d 675).

The sentence that was imposed is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). Ritter, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Jara

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OSCAR JARA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 754

Citing Cases

People v. Shelton

These errors were not harmless, as the proof of the defendant's guilt was not overwhelming ( see People v.…