From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jaquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 2006
34 A.D.3d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-09213.

November 14, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 13, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to four indeterminate terms of one to three years imprisonment under counts one through four of the indictment, all the sentences to run consecutively.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by directing that the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts one and two of the indictment run concurrently with each other, the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts three and four of the indictment run concurrently with each other, and the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts one and two of the indictment run consecutively with the terms of imprisonment imposed on the defendant's convictions under counts three and four of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed is excessive to the extent indicated herein.

The defendant's remaining contention does not require reversal.


Summaries of

People v. Jaquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 2006
34 A.D.3d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Jaquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE JAQUEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 14, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8264
823 N.Y.S.2d 685

Citing Cases

People v. Jaquez

March 2, 2007. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 34 AD3d 598 (Queens). Smith,…

People v. Cole

ed substance in the first degree run concurrently with each other ( see People v. Norris, 20 N.Y.3d 1068,…