From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. James

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 1988
144 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 3, 1988

Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Hanofee, J.).


County Court sentenced defendant to an indeterminate prison term of one to three years and, in addition, imposed the mandatory surcharge of $100 (see, Penal Law § 60.35 [a]). Defendant is indigent. On this appeal, defendant contends that the statute imposing the surcharge is unconstitutional since it violates both State and Federal Equal Protection Clauses and lacks a rational basis for distinguishing between those who must pay the surcharge and those who do not.

We find defendant's equal protection argument unavailing. The issues raised on this appeal have heretofore been resolved by the Court of Appeals in People v. Barnes ( 62 N.Y.2d 702). Defendant's attempt to distinguish the holding in that case, expressly or implicitly, from the matter at hand must fail, together with his claim that the surcharge renders the sentence excessive.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. James

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 1988
144 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. James

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL JAMES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Dunn

imary argument is that the statutes discriminate against indigent inmates whose sentence of incarceration…