From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jaguar Sales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2009
61 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-03684.

April 21, 2009.

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (12), General Business Law article 22-A, and Labor Law §§ 191-c and 193 to enjoin Jaguar Sales, LLC, doing business as Jaguar Sales, Ann Sibiski, David Sibiski, Tom Sibiski, Adam Carlisle, Stephen Barcel, Tim Brown, D.J. Warren, Kelly "Doe," and Premier Sales from engaging in any fraudulent practice, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated March 7, 2008, as granted that branch of the petitioner's cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (d) for a 90-day continuance to conduct discovery.

Ashman Law Offices, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Kenneth J. Ashman of counsel), for appellants.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Benjamin N. Gutman and Sasha Samberg-Champion of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Florio and Belen, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently granted that branch of the petitioner's cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (d) for a 90-day continuance to conduct discovery to determine whether Jaguar Sales, LLC, doing business as Jaguar Sales, and Premier Sales, had sufficient contacts with, and activities in, the State of New York to be subject to personal jurisdiction in New York ( see Peterson v Spartan Indus., 33 NY2d 463).


Summaries of

People v. Jaguar Sales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 2009
61 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Jaguar Sales

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAGUAR SALES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3177
876 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

Fin. Freedom Senior Funding Corp. v. Rose

However, the Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to the plaintiff, although the motion should have…