Opinion
July 24, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The prosecutor's cross-examination of a defense witness regarding her failure to timely come forward with exculpatory information was proper pursuant to People v. Dawson ( 50 N.Y.2d 311).
The defendant's remaining contention, challenging the court's charge to the jury relating to the cross-examination of this witness, is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and, in any event, without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.