From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jadusingh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
217 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 24, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecutor's cross-examination of a defense witness regarding her failure to timely come forward with exculpatory information was proper pursuant to People v. Dawson ( 50 N.Y.2d 311).

The defendant's remaining contention, challenging the court's charge to the jury relating to the cross-examination of this witness, is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and, in any event, without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jadusingh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
217 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Jadusingh

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY JADUSINGH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 240