From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jacobsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1998
252 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 6, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.).


Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the results of his breathalyzer test should have been suppressed because there was insufficient evidence of calibration. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858, 859) and, in any event, is without merit ( see, People v. Freeland, 68 N.Y.2d 699; People v. Sherwood, 160 A.D.2d 1203).

Because the defendant was resentenced, his remaining contention is academic.

Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jacobsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1998
252 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Jacobsen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT JACOBSEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 566