Opinion
March 8, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J.
Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant did not object to the prosecutor's summation, her argument that the prosecutor's characterization of the witnesses was improper is not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Pierce, 219 A.D.2d 856). In any event, the prosecutor's isolated comment did not deprive defendant of a fair trial ( see, People v Dunbar, 213 A.D.2d 1000, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 972).
Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. We have reviewed the contention raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief and conclude that it is without merit.