From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jacob

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2013
108 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-2

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alonzo JACOBS, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Sheilah Fernandez of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Chamoy of counsel), for respondent.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Sheilah Fernandez of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Chamoy of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, FEINMAN, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), rendered July 23, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's challenge for cause to a prospective juror whose initial responses suggested a predisposition to believe police witnesses. Upon further inquiry, the prospective juror stated repeatedly and unequivocally that she could be fair and impartial, even though some of her responses were phrased as “I think so” ( see People v. Chambers, 97 N.Y.2d 417, 419, 740 N.Y.S.2d 291, 766 N.E.2d 953 [2002] ).

Defendant's argument that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove serious physical injury is unpreserved ( see People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 629 N.Y.S.2d 173, 652 N.E.2d 919 [1995] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). An emergency room doctor's testimony established the element of serious physical injury. The doctor testified that the victim lost a great deal of blood and that intervention was urgently needed to save her life. The clear import of this testimony was that the injury created a substantial risk of death ( see People v. Montimaire, 91 A.D.3d 436, 936 N.Y.S.2d 50 [1st Dept. 2012], lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 865, 947 N.Y.S.2d 414, 970 N.E.2d 437 [2012] ).


Summaries of

People v. Jacob

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2013
108 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Jacob

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alonzo JACOBS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 2, 2013

Citations

108 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
968 N.Y.S.2d 489
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4981

Citing Cases

People v. Pridgen

Upon the court's inquiry, the prospective juror stated that he could follow the court's instructions to…

People v. Pridgen

The court properly denied defendant's challenge for cause to a prospective juror whose initial responses…