Opinion
April 3, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant challenges both the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence adduced as to identification. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v. Fleming, 133 A.D.2d 167). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.