Opinion
February 9, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of robbery in the first degree, robbery the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).
The sentences imposed upon the defendant were not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either without merit or do not require reversal.
O'Brien, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.