From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 16, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., PINE, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered ( see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665). Defendant contends that his statements during the plea allocution, coupled with his allegedly exculpatory statements at sentencing, cast doubt upon his guilt and thus that County Court had a duty to make further inquiry at sentencing. We disagree. Because nothing in the plea allocution casts doubt on defendant's guilt, the court had no obligation to conduct a sua sponte inquiry into allegedly exculpatory statements made by defendant at sentencing ( see, People v. Riley, 264 A.D.2d 689, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 906).


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KEATEN JACKSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 807

Citing Cases

People v. Stutzman

Thus, contrary to defendant's contention, her " yes' and no' answers during the plea colloqu[y] do not…

People v. Sciascia

Defendant thereafter was sentenced without objection. He neither moved to withdraw his plea nor moved…