From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2017
59 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-20-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael G. JACKSON, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Dina Zloczower of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Christopher Blira–Koessler of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Dina Zloczower of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Christopher Blira–Koessler of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Melendez, J.), imposed December 14, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 141, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 86, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., HALL, SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2017
59 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael G. JACKSON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 20, 2017

Citations

59 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)