From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2015
134 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

16331 5625/12

12-08-2015

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johnny Jackson, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Lauren Springer of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sylvia Wertheimer of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Lauren Springer of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sylvia Wertheimer of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered August 14, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sex trafficking, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 9 to 18 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the supplemental sex offender fee, and otherwise affirmed.

Although we do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. As the People concede, the imposition of a supplemental sex offender fee, as reflected in the Uniform Sentence and Commitment Sheet, should be vacated because sex trafficking is not one of the enumerated offenses for which that fee may be imposed (see Penal Law § 60.35[1][b]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 8, 2015

CLERK


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2015
134 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Johnny Jackson…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 8, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8962
19 N.Y.S.3d 885

Citing Cases

People v. Sosa

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. As the People concede, the imposition of a supplemental sex…